Not a perfect example of a good sentence. |
So I’ve been reading a free
e-book the past few days, and for good reason: I wouldn’t pay for it. The book.
No, I meant it was free for a good
reason, not that I’ve been reading it for a good reason. Yeah, my bad; I should
have worded that better. Speaking of wording things better, this e-book I was
talking about: I won’t mention it by name or author because that would be mean.
So take this as an insight into why books – even e-books – should have a particular
sales figure attached to them; a sales figure, for instance, that might let you
know at least if the book is well-written.
See, everyone’s up in arms about
e-books taking over the world and burning print books, and how to avoid
copyright infringement, and whether to set e-book prices at $0.99 or $9.99. But
really what needs to be argued is the simple fact that books that have been
looked at by several people who look at books for a living, and are then
revised by people who write books for a living, are a better bet for your $9.99
than a book written by someone who does it after a day of cold-calling families as they sit down to dinner, and are looked at by people who do it after a day of cleaning up after two toddlers and wishing
they had pursued their love of biology in a Master's before marrying that guy, that sells for $0.99.
Do you follow me?
So what we really need in the
e-book world is the same thing we had in the early printing world, and
something that continues a little bit even today: a recognizable and reputable
imprint. Think about groceries: things like rice, sugar, bananas – it’s fine to
get the Flavo-Rite brand of those, because it’s hard to screw up a natural
product. But you start getting into processed foods, things that are flavored
then dried or frozen – you might want to stick to the name brands. It’s
probably not going to make you sick, and with enough experience you’d get used
to it; but those store-brands just never seem to get it quite right. Same with
reputable imprints over vanity-publishers: you can get used to bad writing, but
it’s just not the same.
A lot of times – not always, but
I’ve run into it – if you start pointing out too many little flaws in a written
work, the writer sets his (or her) jaw and exhales just a little bit – just enough
for you to know they think you’re being nit-picky.
But that’s where the work is. If
a writer isn’t ready to find every missing quotation mark, glue together every
fragmented sentence, and re-hang every dangling modifier – they’re not ready to
be an author. Writing – especially fiction – is almost never one of those
professions like doctors whose overbearing parents forced them into a career
they don’t like. So if you’re going to call yourself an author or a writer, it
needs to be because you love the English language (or whatever language in
which you write).
It doesn’t mean you’ll love every minute of it, but give
yourself a head start, right?
No comments:
Post a Comment