According to one sociological
study, it was discovered that, throughout the world, the tasks that constituted
“men’s” and “women’s” work varied widely – in one culture, washing clothes was
considered “men’s” work. But even though the specific tasks varied, what was
oddly universal was that each culture viewed “women’s” work as less important.
Now, this may be a bit of a chicken & egg conversation: that tasks deemed
less important are given to women; not that tasks the women do are therefore
deemed less important. But the point I want to make is two-fold: we still see
this, even in contemporary “liberal” western thought; and I find little
evidence to support such thinking in the Biblical view of God’s kingdom.
As extrapolated in Dr. Del
Tackett’s DVD series The Truth Project,
when exploring a new area of the Christian worldview, we must ask what it is
about the nature of God that can inform that area of study. It is not always
enough to say: “the Bible says to do this”; often we must ask what it is about
the nature of God that causes the Bible to say thus, and how that can then
apply to our personal lives.
So let’s start by asking this: is
man made in God’s image, but not woman? Obviously we understand this not to
mean God has a physical form after which our biological bodies have been
modeled: but is only the male able to reflect the nature of God? Genesis 1
certainly doesn't indicate that: it says “in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.”
And with only a few androgynous exceptions,
every species on earth is made male and female. Almost as if they were all
modeled after something foundational.
Okay: so what? The point is still
that men have certain work to do, and women have other work that, typically, is
to support the man. Isn't that what Paul teaches over and over again? Well, how
were things in the beginning, before
the Fall?
“And God blessed them: and God
said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue
it” (Gen. 1:28a, ASV).
Wait: there’s only one set of
instructions there. You mean, God didn’t say to man do this, and to woman do
the other? What about Paul?
Let’s remember our guiding
principal: what is it about the nature of God that causes the Bible to say
thus, and how can that apply to us today? Is it possible, do you think, that
when Paul pointed out the woman as “the weaker partner” (1 Peter 3:7) he was pointing out a
cultural reality rather than a spiritual one? Because even today, in western
culture too, women rarely have the same power and influence as men. They are
not inherently so, but rather culturally so; and if Scripture teaches anything
about the Christ-follower, it is that we are not to conform to this world.
After all, does not Christ give
us strength to do all things? Is he not the servant who washed the disciples’
feet, and did not he humble himself to death on a cross, that we as his
followers might be able to come into God’s presence, and enjoy eternal life in
him? Did he not give up equality with God in order to come down and lift us up
with him into the heavenly realms?
“Husbands, love your wives as
Christ loved the church” (Eph. 5:25). Paul said that, too. Sounds like I should be humbling
myself according to culture, and elevating her as an equal heir with me and
Christ.
Equal heir.
Equal commands echoing from
Creation.
Wife equal to husband.
Sorry if I annoy you with my
“feminism”: just wait till you meet God.
No comments:
Post a Comment